These 15 AWD SUVs launch hardest for 2025, ranked by 0-60 mph time to pair quick acceleration with all-weather traction, led by the 2025 Tesla Model X.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 1,020 horsepower and 1,050 lb-ft of torque, with 326 miles of range. It takes the top spot with the quickest 0-60 time of 2.5s — well under the segment average of 6.0s. That's better than 99% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 1,025 horsepower and 1,198 lb-ft of torque, with 380 miles of range. It delivers 2.5s 0-60 time. That's better than 99% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 4.0L twin-turbo v8 producing 657 horsepower and 627 lb-ft of torque. 0-60 time: 3.0s — 0.5s slower than the #2 spot. That's better than 99% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 641 horsepower and 770 lb-ft of torque, with 221 miles of range. 0-60 time: 3.1s — 0.1s slower than the #3 spot. That's better than 99% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 6.5L v12 producing 715 horsepower and 528 lb-ft of torque. It delivers 3.1s 0-60 time. That's better than 99% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 4.0L twin-turbo v8 producing 650 horsepower and 626 lb-ft of torque. It delivers 3.1s 0-60 time. That's better than 98% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 630 horsepower and 833 lb-ft of torque, with 305 miles of range. It delivers 3.1s 0-60 time. That's better than 98% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 576 horsepower and 545 lb-ft of torque, with 218 miles of range. 0-60 time: 3.2s — 0.1s slower than the #7 spot. That's better than 98% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 4.0L twin-turbo v8 producing 789 horsepower and 701 lb-ft of torque. It delivers 3.2s 0-60 time. That's better than 97% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 422 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque. 0-60 time: 3.4s — 0.2s slower than the #9 spot. That's better than 97% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 2.0L turbo inline-4 producing 671 horsepower and 752 lb-ft of torque. It delivers 3.4s 0-60 time. That's better than 97% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 6.2L supercharged hemi v8 producing 710 horsepower and 645 lb-ft of torque. 0-60 time: 3.5s — 0.1s slower than the #11 spot. That's better than 97% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 580 horsepower and 481 lb-ft of torque, with 279 miles of range. It delivers 3.5s 0-60 time. That's better than 96% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by an electric powertrain producing 480 horsepower and 700 lb-ft of torque. It delivers 3.5s 0-60 time. That's better than 96% of AWD SUVs.
Powered by a 4.4L twin-turbo v8 + electric producing 738 horsepower and 738 lb-ft of torque. 0-60 time: 3.6s — 0.1s slower than the #14 spot. That's better than 96% of AWD SUVs.
Full Comparison: Fastest AWD SUVs by 0-60 Time in 2025
| # | AWD SUV | 0-60 Time | Price | HP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 Tesla Model X | 2.5s | $79,990 | 1,020 hp |
| 2 | 2025 Rivian R1T | 2.5s | $69,900 | 1,025 hp |
| 3 | 2025 Lamborghini Urus | 3.0s | $233,000 | 657 hp |
| 4 | 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | 3.1s | $67,500 | 641 hp |
| 5 | 2025 Ferrari Purosangue | 3.1s | $438,686 | 715 hp |
| 6 | 2025 Porsche Cayenne | 3.1s | $82,850 | 650 hp |
| 7 | 2025 Porsche Macan | 3.1s | $73,200 | 630 hp |
| 8 | 2025 Kia EV6 | 3.2s | $57,600 | 576 hp |
| 9 | 2025 Lamborghini Urus SE | 3.2s | $260,000 | 789 hp |
| 10 | 2025 Volvo EX30 | 3.4s | $49,900 | 422 hp |
| 11 | 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class | 3.4s | $49,550 | 671 hp |
| 12 | 2025 Dodge Durango | 3.5s | $84,995 | 710 hp |
| 13 | 2025 Tesla Model Y | 3.5s | $44,990 | 580 hp |
| 14 | 2025 Ford Mach-E | 3.5s | $56,995 | 480 hp |
| 15 | 2025 BMW XM | 3.6s | $186,700 | 738 hp |
The Bottom Line
The 2025 Tesla Model X takes the top spot with 2.5s. The 2025 Rivian R1T is a close second. All 15 AWD SUVs listed here beat the 2025 segment average of 6.0s.
How the Fastest AWD SUVs Rank for 2025
Ranked by 0-60 mph time, this list measures launch performance, where all-wheel drive helps put big power down cleanly and confidently. The field mixes electric SUVs, which lead with instant torque, alongside high-output naturally aspirated and twin-turbo gas performance models that stay competitive. All-wheel drive also improves repeatable launches and bad-weather grip.
These are heavy vehicles, so the quickest models demand strong brakes and capable tires, and their performance focus affects running costs. Note that manufacturer 0-60 claims can differ from independently tested results, and a quick launch says nothing about handling, braking, or how a tall SUV behaves at the limit. Figures may reflect a specific trim or configuration.
What to weigh before buying
- Whether launch speed genuinely fits your real-world use.
- Electric instant torque versus gas power delivery and sound.
- Weight, brakes, and tires given the performance.
- Running costs including fuel or charging, insurance, and tires.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fastest AWD SUV from 0-60 in 2025?
By 0-60 mph time, the 2025 Tesla Model X tops our 2025 ranking of the quickest all-wheel-drive SUVs. The figure shown may reflect a specific trim, and manufacturer claims can differ from independent testing. All-wheel drive helps these SUVs convert big power into repeatable, traction-limited launches.
Why do electric SUVs dominate 0-60 times?
Electric motors deliver peak torque almost instantly from a standstill, with no gear changes to interrupt thrust. Combined with all-wheel-drive traction, that lets even heavy electric SUVs post launch times once reserved for sports cars. High-output gas and hybrid models stay competitive but typically trail the quickest EVs off the line.
Does a quick 0-60 mean the SUV handles well?
No. The 0-60 time captures straight-line launch only. It tells you nothing about cornering grip, braking distance, or how a tall, heavy SUV behaves at the limit. A vehicle can launch ferociously yet feel cumbersome in corners, so judge handling separately if it matters to you.
Are manufacturer 0-60 claims reliable?
Treat them as a guide. Automaker figures are often measured under ideal conditions and sometimes use a rollout allowance, so independent test results can differ by a few tenths. Use the claims to rank rivals, but expect real-world times to vary with conditions, surface, and driver.